Since I can't turn on the television lately without seeing a commercial for Spiderman 3, I've been thinking about the first two movies. I'm moderately enthused for the second sequel - I didn't even bother seeing the first two until they were out of theaters, and they're not my favorite comic book movies by any stretch, but it ought to be fun to see the Evil Black Suit and the Pouty-faced Son of the Goblin and such.
However, there's one element of the movies that makes me grit my teeth and reach frantically for the fast forward button.
I. Can't. Abide. That. Girl. Mary Sue, er, Mary Jane. The redheaded bimbo. Blech. She has literally three actions:
1. Screaming
2. Crying
3. Kissing Someone
Doesn't that bug anyone else? Good grief, I thought we had come a long way from the girl being pigeonholed as Damsel in Distress/Brainless Love Interest. But apparently not. She has the personality of a cardboard cutout, honestly, yet every single guy wants her. She is the desired object, and why? She's pretty? Um, shallow a bit? No, actually, I think every guy wants her because that's all she is. Somebody's girlfriend/fianceé/wife. An object that gets passed around from one guy to another. She is never not with some guy. The part that irks me the most is toward the end of the second film, when she has (sort of) accepted that she's not going to be able to be with Peter, the man she loves....and she's going to go ahead and marry Mr. Bland Fianceé. WHY?? It's not fair to the fianceé; it's not fair to herself. Good grief, just go to him and say, "Look, I'm sorry, we had a nice time, but I just can't marry you, it wouldn't be right when I still have feelings for this other guy." She doesn't have to be married to anyone at all. Is this so difficult a concept?? Oh, I know it probably was done that way for the oh-so-gooshy romanticness of her running through the city in a wedding dress, blah blah blah...but it's ridiculous. After everything that happened between her and Peter, even if they're not going to be together, it would be absurd to go ahead and marry someone else. But apparently if she's not with someone, she doesn't exist. Grrr. Grrr. Grrr.
One other annoyance with the second movie - the villain's appearances are far, far too convenient. I understand that the plot needs to be contrived to a certain degree, but he shows up at the beginning, then completely disappears during all of Peter's I-don't-want-to-be-Spiderman crisis, and when he finally show up again, Peter's ready to put on the suit again. How lucky for him. :rolls eyes: Honestly, I was expecting mighty cool things from Doc Oc, and he ended up coming across as kind of lame to me. Ooo, the fusion machine of DOOOOM!! :shrugs: I liked Peter's conflict whether to be or not to be a superhero, in most ways, but it seemed like the villian was just tacked on as an afterthought.
Okay, I'm done ranting now.
However, there's one element of the movies that makes me grit my teeth and reach frantically for the fast forward button.
I. Can't. Abide. That. Girl. Mary Sue, er, Mary Jane. The redheaded bimbo. Blech. She has literally three actions:
1. Screaming
2. Crying
3. Kissing Someone
Doesn't that bug anyone else? Good grief, I thought we had come a long way from the girl being pigeonholed as Damsel in Distress/Brainless Love Interest. But apparently not. She has the personality of a cardboard cutout, honestly, yet every single guy wants her. She is the desired object, and why? She's pretty? Um, shallow a bit? No, actually, I think every guy wants her because that's all she is. Somebody's girlfriend/fianceé/wife. An object that gets passed around from one guy to another. She is never not with some guy. The part that irks me the most is toward the end of the second film, when she has (sort of) accepted that she's not going to be able to be with Peter, the man she loves....and she's going to go ahead and marry Mr. Bland Fianceé. WHY?? It's not fair to the fianceé; it's not fair to herself. Good grief, just go to him and say, "Look, I'm sorry, we had a nice time, but I just can't marry you, it wouldn't be right when I still have feelings for this other guy." She doesn't have to be married to anyone at all. Is this so difficult a concept?? Oh, I know it probably was done that way for the oh-so-gooshy romanticness of her running through the city in a wedding dress, blah blah blah...but it's ridiculous. After everything that happened between her and Peter, even if they're not going to be together, it would be absurd to go ahead and marry someone else. But apparently if she's not with someone, she doesn't exist. Grrr. Grrr. Grrr.
One other annoyance with the second movie - the villain's appearances are far, far too convenient. I understand that the plot needs to be contrived to a certain degree, but he shows up at the beginning, then completely disappears during all of Peter's I-don't-want-to-be-Spiderman crisis, and when he finally show up again, Peter's ready to put on the suit again. How lucky for him. :rolls eyes: Honestly, I was expecting mighty cool things from Doc Oc, and he ended up coming across as kind of lame to me. Ooo, the fusion machine of DOOOOM!! :shrugs: I liked Peter's conflict whether to be or not to be a superhero, in most ways, but it seemed like the villian was just tacked on as an afterthought.
Okay, I'm done ranting now.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-24 03:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-24 03:27 pm (UTC)